Is America Going Greek?

February 17th, 2012

The federal deficit of $1.327 trillion for 2012 marks the fourth straight year in which the deficit has exceeded $1.29 trillion.

The U.S. Debt Clock is now above $15.3 trillion, which comes out to just over $49,000 per American, but a whopping $135,776 per taxpayer.  If your family has four taxpayers, your total portion of the federal debt comes out to more than a half million dollars!

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that U.S. debt will double over the next decade to just under $30 trillion, so your family of four will become millionaires in reverse.

That figure does not include the estimated $56 trillion in unfunded obligations that The Peterson Foundation estimates is committed for Medicare and Medicaid, and pension obligations for government workers.  It also excludes trillions in state and local government debt.

Our total debt now exceeds our gross domestic product.  On an annual basis, it has exceeded 24% of GDP for each of the past four years, up from under 19% a decade ago.  At the same time, with a weak economy, tax revenues are below 16% for the fourth consecutive year.

As the chart from The Wall Street Journal shows, America is on target to become the next Greece.

Attempts at austerity measures in Greece have led to widespread rioting with buildings being burned to the ground.  Debt in Greece, Italy and a handful of other European countries had a bigger impact on the U.S. stock market than any other factor last year, even though Greece’s economy is about the size of the economy of the Dallas-Fort Worth area.

What impact will American debt have on the U.S. economy and the world economy when America becomes the next Greece?

The “Mortgage Deal From Hell”

February 16th, 2012

In a deal with the U.S. Justice Department, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and 49 out of 50 state attorneys, five of the country’s largest lenders have agreed to a $26 billion settlement – that’s more than $5 billion per lender.

Their crime, as nationalmortgagesettlement.com put it, is that “they routinely signed foreclosure related documents outside the presence of a notary public and without really knowing whether the facts they contained were correct.”

Dick Bove, bank analyst for Rochdale Securities, called it “the mortgage deal from hell.”

“Homeowners who made large down payments on their homes or made the terrible mistake to pay down the principal on their mortgages do not qualify,” he said.  “Homeowners who made minimal or no down payments will get the windfall benefit of a lower principal repayment or a cash payment.”

If the deal is from hell, the devil must be in the details … except that there are no details, because, as American Banker reported, “a fully authorized, legally binding deal has not been inked yet.”

Yet, as zerohedge.com points out, the settlement agreement appears to have been “robosigned” as well.  Keep an eye out for the settlement document on nationalmortgagesettlement.com, which says
it is “coming soon.”

It’s yet another example of “do as I say, not as I do.”

As President Obama said, the settlement is just “a start.”  Stay tuned for others.

Beyond Sovereign Debt

November 11th, 2011

Put together a union of strong countries like Germany and weak countries like Greece and what will happen?  Will the weak countries learn from the strong ones and become fiscally responsible?  Or will they expect the strong countries to support them and drag them down in the process?

The later appears to be the case in Europe, where sovereign debt contagion has spread from Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland to threaten the European banking system.

Many European governments have spent recklessly and even attempts to keep the crisis from spreading are being met with wide resistance.  Once a government entitlement is given, it is difficult to take it away.

The crisis goes well beyond government spending.  As Stratfor Global Intelligence recently noted, while attempts are being made to control sovereign debt, “all of the broader problems of overcrediting, housing markets, pensions problems” are not even being addressed.

But the sovereign debt crisis and the European banking crisis are joined at the hip.  The severity of the problem was made evident by the October collapse of Franco-Belgian bank Dexia, which agreed to nationalize its Belgian banking business in exchange for a 90 billion euro ($121 billion) bailout.  Austria has also seen a couple of bank failures, and banks in France have also been reported as being in trouble.

Stratfor believes that “Europe’s banks are as damaged as the governments that regulate them.”  The firm’s analysis notes that, “As a rule the largest purchaser of the debt of any particular European government will be banks located in the particular country. If a government goes bankrupt or is forced to partially default on its debt, its failure will trigger the failure of most of its banks.”

In Europe, banks are more highly regulated and are more dependent on the government than in the U.S.

“You have got the states, who have the banks beholden to them, they are able to twist the arms of the bank executives and force them to do things they would not otherwise do,” according to Stratfor Vice President of Analysis Peter Zeihan.  “Banks just are not willing to challenge the regulators, and so you probably will be able to get a significant buy-in that is voluntary, although not very voluntary.”

And just as European banks are dependent on their government, the European economy is deeply dependent on European banks.

“Americans only use bank loans to fund 31 percent of total private credit,” Stratfor notes, “with bond issuances (18 percent) and stock markets (51 percent) making up the balance.  In the eurozone roughly 80 percent of private credit is bank-sourced.”

This interdependence hints at the complexity of the sovereign debt problem, while underscoring just what’s at stake and why all of Europe is so dependent on a solution to the sovereign debt crisis.

Europanic Spreading

November 10th, 2011

Stocks surged recently when a new plan for dealing with Europe’s sovereign debt was announced.  Then they came crashing back down when it became clear that the plan was more style than substance.

The continental crisis is much deeper than initially advertised, and the future of the euro, the European Union and Europe’s banking system is being threatened.  Likewise, though, when someone sneezes in Greece, America catches a cold.  American banks have more than $1.2 trillion in loan exposure through German and French banks, which is one reason why the sovereign-debt crisis has affected U.S. markets.

So how deep is the crisis and what impact can we expect in the U.S.?

Stratfor Global Intelligence recently noted that the plan agreed upon to date is “not even more than a baby step on the road to saving Europe.”

Stratfor Vice President of Analysis Peter Zeihan further noted that even after writing down a percentage of the debt, Europe is going to need to attract investments from countries like the U.S., China and Japan.  Unfortunately, such investments will likely carry more potential risk than reward.

“And so the Chinese, the Japanese and anyone else who thinks they have a vested interest in the success of Europe,” Zeihan said, “they have to be asking why would I put my money into a system that the Europeans are not willing to back?”

One problem is that profligate spenders aren’t changing their behavior.

“The primary reason Greece has not defaulted on its nearly 400-billion euro sovereign debt is that the rest of the Eurozone is not forcing Greece to fully implement its agreed-upon austerity measures,” according to Stratfor.  “Withholding bailout funds as punishment would trigger an immediate default and a cascade of disastrous effects across Europe.  Loudly condemning Greek inaction while still slipping Athens bailout checks keeps that aspect of Europe’s crisis in a holding pattern.”

Europe is trying to “rescue its rescue,” as The Wall Street Journal put it, but with little success so far.  The Europanic crisis of the day is that Italy is in danger of having financing cut off.  Italy is nearly 2 trillion euros in debt ($2.77 trillion).

The European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) can’t raise enough to get European debt under control, but it hopes leverage will help.  Leverage … there’s a term we haven’t heard much since 2008.

Coming Soon to the U.S.A.

Europe’s woos should provide a cautionary lesson to the United States, with its $15 trillion in debt.  While a “super committee” is seeking solutions, one party wants to raise taxes without making significant spending cuts, while the other party wants to make cuts without raising taxes.

If the super committee fails and U.S. debt continues to grow, who will bail us out?

Even the Volatility Index Is Volatile

October 11th, 2011

You know volatility is out of control when the index that measures volatility is itself setting new records for volatility.

In the second week of August, U.S. equity markets witnessed four consecutive days of 400-point swings, the first time that has happened in the stock exchange’s 115 year history.

Given that volatility, it’s no surprise that the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (VIX) had its largest quarterly increase ever in the third quarter of 2011.  The VIX has held above 30% for the past several months, its longest period above that level since the five-month period of October 2008 to March 2009.

The VIX is a predictor of expected market volatility for the 30 days to come.  Anytime the VIX exceeds 30%, you can expect the market to be volatile for a month afterward.

The VIX is not nearly as high as it was in October 2008, when it spiked up over 80%, but it’s even more volatile than it was three years ago.

On four days in October 2008 (eight between August and December 2008), the VIX registered one-day swings exceeding 6.5%, which had previously happened only twice since its inception in 1990.  In fact, the VIX swings exceeded 20% on several days in 2008.

In August of this year, though, the VIX with one-day swings of 50%, 35.4% and 35.1%.  And the volatility is expected to continue.

The High Price of High-Frequency Trading

August 18th, 2011

Whatever its perceived benefits, HFT is changing the way the stock market operates.

It used to be that companies went public to raise capital; investors took risks by buying company stock, and the company and investors were rewarded when the company used its capital wisely.  The principles of supply and demand dictated stock prices, creating an efficient market in which prices adjusted based on market demand.

But HFT is affecting market fundamentals.

The majority of trades taking place today are driven not by company performance, but by tiny inefficiencies that only computers can detect.  While investors are advised to “buy and hold” their investments for years, computers are trading in nanoseconds.  High-frequency traders also buy and sell options, futures, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), currencies and all other financial instruments that are traded electronically, so its impact goes beyond the stock market.

Individual investors used to be the heart and soul of the stock market.  Today, big hedge funds and big banks are making billions of dollars off of HFT based on information that is unavailable to the average investor.  Just as small investors were hurt by the 1987 crash, while program trading gave big traders an advantage, technology again is creating an unfair advantage for big investors.

Since its introduction in 1999, electronic trading has transformed the way stock markets operate.  Other electronic trading strategies are also having an impact on the market, although not to the degree that HFT is.

We need to keep in mind, though, that computers are only as good as the information that goes into them.  Comparisons can be made to the mortgage industry.  While there were many other issues involved, the recent financial crisis began after computers took over the processing of mortgages and many unqualified people became homeowners.

Likewise, when computers do the trading on the stock market, removing the human element, mistakes are likely to happen.  The more dominant HFT becomes, the bigger the next accident is likely to be.

For more information, see my article on high-frequency trading here.

High-Frequency Trading Accounts For Three Out of Four Trades

August 17th, 2011

With graphs of stock market prices looking like the Alps recently, people are hearing a great deal about high-frequency trading (HFT) and its impact on the market.

Except for hearing media comments about it after last May’s “flash crash,” though, most investors know little about it.  So what is it and why should you care?

HFT, which is conducted by proprietary trading desks at big banks and private hedge funds, uses computers to make trading decisions and execute trades based on perceived pricing inefficiencies.

It now accounts for 73% of all equity trading in the U.S., up from 30% four years ago, according to TABB Group, which researches financial markets.  It
is not as dominant in other countries, but its use is growing.

Not only has HFT grown in volume, it has grown in speed.  While computers took a couple of seconds to execute trades a few years ago, today trades are being executed in nanoseconds – that’s billionths of seconds.

The greater the use of HFT, of course, the greater the impact it can have.  And, because programs in place today trade so rapidly, HFT can wreak havoc on the market.

During the “flash crash,” the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell nearly 1,000 points in 20 minutes – the fastest and largest drop in market history.

Individual investors have been leaving the market as HFT has grown.  As HFT continues to fill the void, it may continue to push out the individual investor
and take on an even greater percentage of trading volume.

Some support the use of HFT, suggesting that it lowers volatility, narrows the spreads between bid and offer prices, creates liquidity and reduces the cost of trading for all market participants.

If HFT lowers volatility, shouldn’t the market be less volatile than it used to be?  HFT may also increase liquidity, but that liquidity is not available when it is needed most.

200-Day Moving Average Says the Bear Is Back

August 10th, 2011

Investment managers regard the 200-day moving average price of an index such as the S&P 500 or of an individual stock as the dividing line.  An index or stock trading above the 200-day average is being bought and is in an upward trend.  An index or stock trading below the 200-day average is being sold and is in a downward trend.

The moving average smoothes out short-term price fluctuations and provides a high-level look that makes sense of the market.  For money managers attuned to managing risk, a close below the 200-day moving average marks a change in trend, from a bull market to a bear market.

The market moved prices below the 200-day moving average on Tuesday, Aug. 2, indicating the start of a bear market.

In response, we recommend that portfolios remain diversified, with higher-than-normal money market balances, fixed-income holdings and low-correlated assets.  This will protect investors from experiencing the full brunt of the stock market sell-off.   While buying opportunities are likely to present themselves, they should be considered cautiously and with discipline.

The U.S. Isn’t Greece – Yet

August 9th, 2011

If a “sovereign debt” crisis in Greece (population 10.7 million) can cause stock prices around the world to fall, what will happen to world markets if there is a similar crisis in the United States (population 307 million)?

The questions is relevant, given Standard & Poor’s decision to lower the U.S. credit rating from the perfect AAA it has held since 1917 to AA+. While some of the recent stock market drop – the worst since 2008 – can be attributed to other factors, such as sovereign debt in Europe and the continuing weak economy, the lower credit rating, has had a significant market impact.

The U.S. isn’t Greece – at least not yet – but it seems to be heading in that direction, in spite of the recent debt ceiling agreement, which cut $2.5 trillion from future spending.

Greece’s debt represents 155% of gross domestic product and is expected to reach 170% next year, according to The Wall Street Journal. In other words, the government is spending $1.55 for every dollar’s worth of goods the country produces.

Meanwhile, the U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio is approaching 100% – even though it excludes an estimated $61.6 trillion in unfunded obligations for Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. In addition, state and local governments have trillions of dollars in unfunded debt obligations.

In addition to running a $1.5 trillion budget deficit, the U.S. government added $5.3 trillion in financial obligations in 2010 for off-budget items, according to USA Today.

Maybe we’re not so far away from Greece after all.

Market Going In Wrong Direction

August 8th, 2011

With profits exceeding analyst forecasts and a debt-ceiling agreement reached, there was reason to believe that the market might be ready to reverse direction and head back up last week.

Given the expectation of continued strong profits, it looked like the S&P 500 could reach the 1,400 to 1,425 level by year end (it’s high so far this year was 1,370).  Now though, the chances for that level of price appreciation are increasingly appearing remote.

Consider why:

  • Credit rating downgrade.  The U.S. government had maintained a perfect AAA credit rating since 1917 until Standard & Poor’s downgraded it to AA+ on Friday.
  • Sovereign-debt crises. Europe’s troubles have spread far beyond Greece.  Ireland, Spain, Portugal and now Italy are all financially unfit.
  • High unemployment. Unemployment remains above 9%, in spite of the $814 billion economic stimulus program, extension of the Bush-era tax cuts and two rounds of quantitative easing.
  • Low economic growth.  Earlier in the year, many were concerned that gross domestic product grew at an annual rate of just 1.9%.  It turns out that figure was too generous.  The Bureau of Economic Analysis revised the first quarter growth rate down to 0.4%, while the economy grew at an annual rate of just 1.3% in the second quarter.
  • The debt crisis.  While last week’s agreement reduced future spending by an estimated $2.5 trillion (assuming the projected cuts all take place), keep in mind that the agreement allowed government to add $2.5 trillion in new debt, which would raise the ceiling to $16.8 trillion.  It also leaves Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security untouched – even though they represent $61.6 trillion in unmet obligations.

Suddenly, the 1990s seem like a lifetime ago.